<. .





Access the Best on the Web





The following is from Commentary magazine, February, 1997, pages 20-21. It is taken from an article written by Walter Berns.

"Walter Berns is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and professor emeritus of government at Georgetown University."


" ... immediately after adopting the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, the Continental Congress appointed a committee - consisting again of Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin - to `prepare a device for a Seal of the United States of North America,' and on that Great Seal appear these words (they are on every dollar bill), Novus Ordo Seclorum, meaning a new order of the ages, new because it was the first to recognize the rights of man, and then to give them constitutional protection. In the words of James Madison, the Founders `accomplished a revolution which has no parallel in the annals of human society.' It is the Constitution, a product of that revolution, and not a recondite `moral law,' that the President swears to `protect and defend,' the members of Congress to `support,' and the judges to `support and defend.'

"The Founders were proud of their work. The Constitution, they said, provided a remedy for the `diseases' most incident to democratic government, and The Federalist (written to persuade the people to give it their consent) leaves no doubt as to what they understood to be a disease: zealous opinions `concerning religion,' `tyrannical majorities,' `angry and malignant passions,' `a factious spirit,' the dangerous ambition that `often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people,' and those who begin their careers 'by paying obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants.'

"To guard against these democratic diseases, or vices, the Constitution, in addition to consigning religion to the private sphere by separating church and state, withholds powers, separates powers, and excludes the people `in their collective capacity' from any share in the exercise of these powers. In a word, republican (or limited) government would be possible under a Constitution that excluded, or at least inhibited, the zealous, the angry, the morally indignant; and this, in turn, depended on confining the business of government to issues that did not give rise to zeal, anger, or moral indignation.... "

site index top


If you like this site, please

click the eye and tell a friend


BigEye Internet Search:  
The Web  News  MP3 Video Audio Images

©Copyright 1995-2003: BigEye.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sponsored by The Wise BirdReverse Mortgages, etc., and by Unified Companies,
.